Thoughts on Management-Supervision

I like to think of myself as a well rounded individual in many respects.  My education afforded me the opportunity to be immersed in many fields, chemistry (P chem., quant, biochem), physics, math, biology, microbiology, economics, accounting to name a few.  Also, I did take a few other courses such as German, French, philosophy, botany that were not part of my undergraduate degree, but I enrolled in the classes just for the sake of satiating my curiosity.  I might be going about this in a rather awkward manner in attempting to present an idea that, for some of you, might be off the wall but I think that my background may shed some light on this insight.  The current concept of management/supervision must be looked at from a different perspective.  Can anyone become a manager?  Can you teach/instill management skills on/to anyone?  Does an MBA certify you as a competent manager?  From my perspective the answer to all these questions is an emphatic NO.  Now, I might be a bit harsh in this assessment but I will take you on a trip in trying to explicate my reason for stating it so directly.

I’ve noticed throughout my lifetime that people will naturally gravitate to someone that has the innate skill to tell a story, weave the intricacies of a tale, or deliver a joke with just the right punch line.  I think we all know these types of people; they have the gift of gab, can be genuinely interesting, and are amicable and approachable.  On a tangent, this intrinsic skill may be environmental or genetic or a combination, but this is for another discussion.  Nevertheless, this skill learned/acquired/born with provides a person with a quality that is essential for a manager–the ability to verbalize thoughts as well exuding a sense of comfort.  Most people would much rather have managers that you can approach, talk to, and perhaps, this is very important, feel at ease with.  In my opinion, these natural skills cannot be taught.  Alright, you might disagree with me and say that manners, empathy, and sympathy can be taught; again, this fodder for another discussion.  No matter how much schooling you have you will revert to your old self.  With this statement I am referring to those managers that have been schooled in how to be, act, and whistle like a manager but these learned skills are not sufficient to make you a true manager.  OK, I am going off on another tangent but be patient.  Here, I am talking about that manager that just received their evaluation not from their peers but from those they supervise.  It can be a shock to many a supervisor/manager to be have to go through such a performance appraisal.  They’ll schedule a meeting with fellow employees and state that you’ll be making changes to be a better manager.   But this lasts for a couple of months, inexorably, they revert to their old ways; those ways they feel comfortable with.  On the extreme side, there are those managers (it appears that they all go to the same school) that have learned these managerial skills.  Firm handshake, pat you on the back, take the time to remember your name (and they make a point of it), attempt to interact and to make personal conversations-How are you today? Noticed that you …Their people skills are very plastic and not genuine and are just playing the parts they learned in some far off school.  Dang it, I would really like to know where they go to learn these artificial skills.

Ok, so I’ve introduced some basic skills necessary for a manager.  But is this enough?  The answer is probably no; which brings me to a very important aspect of who gets drawn instinctively to a managerial position.  There was a study done recently by Amy B. Brunell, et al, “Leader Emergence: The Case of the Narcissistic Leader”, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 15 Sept 08–that attempts to associate narcissism and the emergence of a leader in a leaderless group.  It is an interesting study in many respects in that it presents the skills of a narcissist and how these skills endow such a person to rise through the ranks to reach management/supervisory level.  “The interest in narcissism, in part, reflects the apparent contradiction in narcissists as leaders. On one hand, narcissists appear prevalent in leadership roles, such as presidents and chief executive officers (Deluga, 1997; Maccoby, 2000; Rosenthal & Pittinsky, 2006; Wasylyshyn, 2005). On the other hand, the quantitative research on narcissists as leaders suggests that they increase the risk for a host of negative consequences, both for themselves and their organizations (Hogan & Hogan, 2001). For example, narcissism is associated with poor performance ratings from supervisors (Blair, Hoffman, & Helland, 2006), volatile and risky decision making and performance (Chatterjee & Hambrick, 2006), counterproductive workplace behavior (Judge, LePine, & Rich, 2006; Penney & Spector, 2002), lower contextual performance (Judge et al., 2006), lower peer likability in social organizations (Harms, Wood, & Roberts, 2006), resource destruction (Campbell, Bush, Brunell, & Shelton, 2005), and even white-collar crime (Blickle, Schlegel, Fassbender, & Klein, 2006).”  This quote was taken from the study to present some of the aspects associated with narcissists.  Alright, so the chances that a narcissist will rise to the top are greater than someone else due to some of the native skills that I’ve outlined.  In addition, a narcissist will surround themselves with, you guessed it–they will need “Yes” people to resound their supreme skills.  Narcissistic people have an ulterior motive to everything they do and that is promoting themselves.  What is good for the agency may not be good for the narcissistic leader or as has been stated in the quoted paragraph, what may be good for the agency may not be good for the narcissistic leader.

Wow, people skills in a manager can be a two-edged sword.  It can be a truly wonderful gift but it can attract people that are just not fit for the job, or at least, not fit to lead for the right reasons. Would you be able to discern whether a manager has narcissistic tendencies or whether their management skills are truly honorable?

5 Responses leave one →
  1. 2009 January 22
    Chuck Lytle permalink

    I think success at being a manager is similar to success at teaching, and it parallels comedy. To wit: you’re either funny or your not. I honestly believe it can’t be taught. Oh, you can learn the nuts and bolts, but as a creative writing instructor told our class: “I can teach you the craft of writing, but I can’t make you Hemingway.”

    I guess I’m saying that being really good at almost anything comes from something innate within each of us. Some people become great basketball players, some great violinists, some great managers. The tragedy of life is the inability, for whatever reason, to discover where our own personal greatness lies.

  2. 2009 January 25

    Chuck:

    Thanks for the response. In addition to what I’ve written there are issues of ethics, responsibility, and honesty.

    There are numerous people that apply for a job as a manager or supervisor just to earn more money believing that it is “just another job”. I look at a managerial/supervisory position in much the same manner that I see parenthood. It entails certain responsibilities that somewhat parallel each other. You are in charge of human beings and are responsible for their “growth”, understanding of the world (home, job), and ensuring their safety (life/job). This includes the emotional aspects associated with human interactions: conflict resolution (hey, Mom, Timmy just hit me; Why is it that you treat my Brother better than me?…), empathy, sympathy, encouragement, cleaning up that booboo and puting a band-aid on the cut, and lest we forget, pulling a person to the side and having to explain that “Timmy, what you did was wrong so please go in that room and say sorry to your brother”. Does this mean that parents are better managers than say, someone that is not married or has kids? It is true that it takes commitment to be in a binding relationship and it takes responsibility to be a parent. If a manager/supervisor does not like their current engagement with their employer they can simply leave and find another job. It is much more difficult for a parent to walk out on a child or a wife. Of course, there are terrible parents but in terms of survival, many parents will do as much as they can so that their kids will survive in this world.

    Then, there are those people that go into management thinking that they will make a difference in their work environment and make it a better world. In the long run, becoming a manager means having a conflict between what is good for the company may not be good for the employee or vice-versa. This issue is for another time. Cost cutting, making sure that sales goals are reached, KIP…

    I think that I’ve written enough for today. I’ll continue it another day.

  3. 2009 January 29
    Chuck Lytle permalink

    Victor,

    I agree. And well said. From my observations, it seems as if many “parents” often treat children as doo-dads and never really come to grips with the issues you articulate. Sometimes it seems as if parents treat their children as if they were nothing more than a new pair of shoes. A slightly different situation is my observation that many teachers in the public school system really seem to dislike children. Talk about a fundamental “management” problem!

  4. 2009 February 14

    Victor,

    I have experienced some of the devastating results of narcissistic leadership in the workplace. Not only was it responsible for much “group think” and the loss of creativity, but it hurt people lives. And all of this obviously affects the bottom line with things like productivity, ingenuity, creative solutions, and almost anything else I can think of for creating a successful workplace.

    I think your question is a good one. I’ve always wondered why so many bad managers have been hired when there is no way they should be in charge of meeting the bottom line – let alone, in charge of people.

    • 2009 September 11

      The comment about wanting “Yes men” is very true. Alot of managers hire new employees to mold them into what they want so they don’t have to entertain other suggestions. As the new employee becomes more educated he becomes a nuisance to the employer.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS